Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1380not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.90no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameRV620Tiger Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 February 2009 (16 years ago)2 September 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40768
Core clock speed594 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors181 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.37652.80
Floating-point processing power0.04752 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs448
L2 Cache64 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data3.75 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed396 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.336 GB/sno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 February 2009 2 September 2020
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU has an age advantage of 11 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4250 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4250 is a desktop graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4250
Radeon HD 4250
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 85 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 166 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4250 or Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.