Radeon RX Vega M vs ATI HD 4225
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 372 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 80.23 |
| Architecture | RV6xx (2008−2010) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | RS880M | Vega |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 May 2010 (15 years ago) | 1 February 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 40 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 380 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1190 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 38.08 |
| ROPs | no data | 8 |
| TMUs | no data | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | IGP |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | no data | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2010 | 1 February 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 14 nm |
RX Vega M has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4225 and Radeon RX Vega M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 4225 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
