AMD Pro Vega 20 vs ATI HD 4225

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data14.41
ArchitectureRV6xx (2007−2010)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code nameRS880MVega Mobile
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 May 2010 (13 years old)15 November 2018 (5 years old)
Current priceno data$360
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores401280
Core clock speed380 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1283 MHz
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data102.6

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 4225 and Radeon Pro Vega 20 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus widthno data1024 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1480 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data189.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkanno data1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI HD 4225 141
Pro Vega 20 33590
+23807%

Pro Vega 20 outperforms HD 4225 by 23807% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 1 May 2010 15 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4225 and Radeon Pro Vega 20. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4225 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4225
Radeon HD 4225
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate ATI Radeon HD 4225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 83 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.