GeForce Go 6150 vs Radeon HD 4225
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | RV6xx (2007−2010) | no data |
| GPU code name | RS880M | C51MV |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 May 2010 (13 years ago) | 1 February 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $299 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 40 | 3 |
| Core clock speed | 380 MHz | 1 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 425 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 110 nm |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | shared Memory |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 | shared Memory |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Recency | 1 May 2010 | 1 February 2006 |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 110 nm |
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4225 and GeForce Go 6150. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
