Quadro2 Pro vs ATI Radeon HD 4200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1418not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameRS880NV15 A4
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2009 (16 years ago)22 March 2001 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speed500 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors181 million25 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm180 nm
Texture fill rate2.0000.8
Floating-point processing power0.04 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)7.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.0N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4200 111
+11000%
Samples: 1302
Quadro2 Pro 1
Samples: 3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2009 22 March 2001
Chip lithography 55 nm 180 nm

ATI HD 4200 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 227% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4200 and Quadro2 Pro. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4200 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro2 Pro is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 307 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Quadro2 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4200 or Quadro2 Pro, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.