P106-100 vs ATI Radeon HD 4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 4200 with P106-100, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 4200
2009
0.26

P106-100 outperforms HD 4200 by a whopping 5965% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1410367
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.13
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameRS880GP106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 August 2009 (16 years ago)19 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores401280
Core clock speed500 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1709 MHz
Number of transistors181 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000136.7
Floating-point processing power0.04 TFLOPS4.375 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs480
L1 Cacheno data480 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 4200 0.26
P106-100 15.77
+5965%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4200 111
Samples: 1302
P106-100 6627
+5870%
Samples: 125

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5900%
180−190
+5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−5614%
400−450
+5614%
Valorant 24−27
−5900%
1500−1550
+5900%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−5669%
750−800
+5669%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Dota 2 9−10
−5456%
500−550
+5456%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5900%
180−190
+5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−5614%
400−450
+5614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%
Valorant 24−27
−5900%
1500−1550
+5900%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Dota 2 9−10
−5456%
500−550
+5456%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5900%
180−190
+5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−5614%
400−450
+5614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%
Valorant 24−27
−5900%
1500−1550
+5900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5900%
180−190
+5900%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−5614%
800−850
+5614%
Valorant 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 15.77
Recency 1 August 2009 19 June 2017
Chip lithography 55 nm 16 nm

P106-100 has a 5965.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4200 is a desktop graphics card while P106-100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4200
Radeon HD 4200
NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 305 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 339 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4200 or P106-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.