T400 Mobile vs ATI Radeon HD 3870

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1058not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency0.96no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV670TU117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 November 2007 (18 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320896
Core clock speed777 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors666 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate12.4379.80
Floating-point processing power0.4973 TFLOPS2.554 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs1656
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1126 MHz10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth72.06 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 106 Watt 18 Watt

T400 Mobile has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 488.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3870 and T400 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3870 is a desktop graphics card while T400 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3870
Radeon HD 3870
NVIDIA T400 Mobile
T400 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 185 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate T400 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3870 or T400 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.