GMA 600 vs ATI Radeon HD 3870

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking995not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency0.94no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)PowerVR SGX535 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameRV670Lincroft
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 November 2007 (17 years ago)4 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32032
Core clock speed777 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors666 million140 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.431.600
Floating-point processing power0.4973 TFLOPS0.0256 TFLOPS
ROPs161
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1126 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth72.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)10.1
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.3ES 2.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2007 4 May 2010
Chip lithography 55 nm 45 nm

GMA 600 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 22.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3870 and GMA 600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3870 is a desktop card while GMA 600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3870
Radeon HD 3870
Intel GMA 600
GMA 600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 161 vote

Rate Radeon HD 3870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GMA 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.