Radeon RX Vega 9 vs ATI HD 3870 Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated669
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.87
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV670Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 June 2008 (17 years ago)26 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320576
Core clock speed777 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors666 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate12.43no data
Floating-point processing power0.4973 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs16no data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1126 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth72.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 June 2008 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 106 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 9 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 606.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition and Radeon RX Vega 9. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition
Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Radeon RX Vega 9

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition or Radeon RX Vega 9, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.