ATI FireGL V7300 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1168not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency0.99no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameRV670R520
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date19 November 2007 (18 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 $1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed668 MHz594 MHz
Number of transistors666 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt97 Watt
Texture fill rate10.699.504
Floating-point processing power0.4275 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1616
TMUs1616
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length208 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed830 MHz648 MHz
Memory bandwidth53.12 GB/s41.47 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2007 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 97 Watt

ATI HD 3850 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 64% more advanced lithography process, and 29% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3850 and FireGL V7300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3850 is a desktop graphics card while FireGL V7300 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 222 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3850 or FireGL V7300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.