Jetson TK1 GPU vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking868not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Power efficiency1.04no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameRV670GK20A
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 April 2008 (16 years ago)15 October 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320192
Core clock speed669 MHz756 MHz
Boost clock speedno data951 MHz
Number of transistors666 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt8 Watt
Texture fill rate10.707.608
Floating-point processing power0.4282 TFLOPS0.3652 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed828 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth52.99 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.3ES 3.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/A1.1
CUDA-3.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 April 2008 15 October 2014
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 8 Watt

Jetson TK1 GPU has an age advantage of 6 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3850 X2 and Jetson TK1 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3850 X2 is a desktop card while Jetson TK1 GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Radeon HD 3850 X2
NVIDIA Jetson TK1 GPU
Jetson TK1 GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3850 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Jetson TK1 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.