GeForce GT 520 PCI vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1076not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.04no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRV670GF119
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 January 2008 (16 years ago)13 April 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32048
Core clock speed668 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors666 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt29 Watt
Texture fill rate10.696.480
Floating-point processing power0.4275 TFLOPS0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed828 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth52.99 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2008 13 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 29 Watt

GT 520 PCI has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 158.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3850 AGP and GeForce GT 520 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI
GeForce GT 520 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 31 vote

Rate Radeon HD 3850 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 12 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.