GeForce RTX 3080 vs Radeon HD 3750

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated23
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data23.48
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameRV635Ampere GA102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 September 2008 (15 years ago)16 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699
Current price$90 $823 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1208704
Core clock speed796 MHz1450 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1710 MHz
Number of transistors378 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate6.368465.1
Floating-point performance191.04 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB10 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1386 MHz19000 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.18 GB/s760.3 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDAno data8.5

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 11 September 2008 16 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 10 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 320 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3750 and GeForce RTX 3080. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3750
Radeon HD 3750
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 10 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5075 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.