GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs ATI Radeon HD 3750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1199
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.66
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV635G94
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 September 2008 (17 years ago)23 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12048
Core clock speed796 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors378 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt90 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate6.36815.60
Floating-point processing power0.191 TFLOPS0.156 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs824
L2 Cache128 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin
SLI options-2-way

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed693 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.18 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoTwo Dual Link DVIHDTV
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 23 October 2008
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 90 Watt

ATI HD 3750 has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process, and 38.5% lower power consumption.

9600 GSO 512, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3750 and GeForce 9600 GSO 512. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3750
Radeon HD 3750
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
GeForce 9600 GSO 512

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 13 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 64 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3750 or GeForce 9600 GSO 512, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.