ATI Radeon X1600 PRO vs ATI HD 3690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1437
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.43
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameRV670RV530
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 March 2008 (18 years ago)1 October 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed670 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors666 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt41 Watt
Texture fill rate10.722.000
Floating-point processing power0.4288 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs164
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed830 MHz390 MHz
Memory bandwidth26.56 GB/s12.48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2008 1 October 2007
Chip lithography 55 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 41 Watt

ATI HD 3690 has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 64% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1600 PRO, on the other hand, has 83% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3690 and Radeon X1600 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 3690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 133 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3690 or Radeon X1600 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.