Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs ATI HD 3690

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated147
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.53
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV670Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date30 March 2008 (16 years ago)19 March 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3204096
Core clock speed670 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1468 MHz
Number of transistors666 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate10.72375.8
Floating-point processing power0.4288 TFLOPS12.03 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs16256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed830 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth26.56 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2008 19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt

ATI HD 3690 has 233.3% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega 64X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3690 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3690 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3690
Radeon HD 3690
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 3690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.