ATI Radeon 9800 XT vs ATI HD 3690

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1422
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.17
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameRV670R360
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 March 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed670 MHz412 MHz
Number of transistors666 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate10.723.296
Floating-point processing power0.4288 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed830 MHz365 MHz
Memory bandwidth26.56 GB/s23.36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2008 1 October 2003
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 60 Watt

ATI HD 3690 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 XT, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3690 and Radeon 9800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3690
Radeon HD 3690
ATI Radeon 9800 XT
Radeon 9800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 3690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 14 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.