Quadro FX 4000 SDI vs ATI Radeon HD 3690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRV670NV41
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2008 (17 years ago)19 April 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed670 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors666 million190 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate10.725.100
Floating-point processing power0.4288 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs1612
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data214 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed830 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth26.56 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 4x SDI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.32.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2008 19 April 2004
Chip lithography 55 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt

ATI HD 3690 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 136.4% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3690 and Quadro FX 4000 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3690 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 4000 SDI is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3690
Radeon HD 3690
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI
Quadro FX 4000 SDI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 3690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3690 or Quadro FX 4000 SDI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.