FireStream 9350 vs ATI Radeon HD 3690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRV670Cypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2008 (17 years ago)1 June 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201440
Core clock speed670 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors666 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate10.7250.40
Floating-point processing power0.4288 TFLOPS2.016 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs1672
L1 Cacheno data144 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed830 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth26.56 GB/s128.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2008 1 June 2010
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt

ATI HD 3690 has 100% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3690 and FireStream 9350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3690 is a desktop graphics card while FireStream 9350 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3690
Radeon HD 3690
AMD FireStream 9350
FireStream 9350

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 3690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3690 or FireStream 9350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.