ATI Radeon Xpress X1250 vs ATI HD 3650

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1259not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.41no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)no data
GPU code nameRV635RS690M
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 January 2008 (16 years ago)1 February 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1204
Core clock speed725 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data350 MHz
Number of transistors378 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.800no data
Floating-point processing power0.174 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)no data
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 January 2008 1 February 2007
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 80 nm

ATI HD 3650 has an age advantage of 11 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3650 and Radeon Xpress X1250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3650 is a desktop card while Radeon Xpress X1250 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3650
Radeon HD 3650
ATI Radeon Xpress X1250
Radeon Xpress X1250

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 89 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 13 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress X1250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.