Radeon Vega 11 Embedded vs ATI HD 3650 AGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1343not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.43no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV635Raven
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 January 2008 (18 years ago)13 February 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120704
Core clock speed725 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors378 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate5.80057.20
Floating-point processing power0.174 TFLOPS1.83 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs844
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xIGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsFloppyNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 January 2008 13 February 2018
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Vega 11 Embedded has an age advantage of 10 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3650 AGP and Radeon Vega 11 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 28 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3650 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 23 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3650 AGP or Radeon Vega 11 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.