FireStream 9270 vs ATI Radeon HD 3610

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated726
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.49
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameRV630RV770
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date24 September 2009 (15 years ago)13 November 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120800
Core clock speed594 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors390 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate4.75230.00
Floating-point processing power0.1426 TFLOPS1.2 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed396 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.67 GB/s115.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 September 2009 13 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 160 Watt

ATI HD 3610 has an age advantage of 10 months, and 357.1% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9270, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3610 and FireStream 9270. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3610 is a desktop card while FireStream 9270 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3610
Radeon HD 3610
AMD FireStream 9270
FireStream 9270

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 31 vote

Rate Radeon HD 3610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.