UHD Graphics 920 vs ATI Radeon HD 3470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1397not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.72no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRV620Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 January 2008 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speed800 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors181 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200no data
Floating-point processing power0.064 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed950 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth15.2 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 920 has a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3470 and UHD Graphics 920. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3470
Radeon HD 3470
Intel UHD Graphics 920
UHD Graphics 920

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 57 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 85 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3470 or UHD Graphics 920, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.