Radeon 625 vs ATI HD 3300 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated868
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.96
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRS780Polaris 24
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 August 2008 (17 years ago)13 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40384
Core clock speed494 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speed695 MHz1024 MHz
Number of transistors180 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate2.78024.58
Floating-point processing power0.0556 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs424
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.02.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 August 2008 13 May 2019
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm

Radeon 625 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3300 IGP and Radeon 625. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3300 IGP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 625 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 16 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3300 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 166 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3300 IGP or Radeon 625, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.