RTX A4500 vs ATI Radeon HD 3300 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated67
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.41
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRS780GA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 August 2008 (17 years ago)23 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores407168
Core clock speed494 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed695 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors180 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data200 Watt
Texture fill rate2.780369.6
Floating-point processing power0.0556 TFLOPS23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs4224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data7 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data640.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 August 2008 23 November 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm

RTX A4500 has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3300 IGP and RTX A4500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3300 IGP is a desktop graphics card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3300 IGP
Radeon HD 3300 IGP
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 16 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3300 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 212 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3300 IGP or RTX A4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.