Radeon E9260 MXM vs ATI HD 3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1459not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRS780Baffin
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 March 2008 (18 years ago)27 September 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40896
Core clock speed494 MHz1090 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors180 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.97657.60
Floating-point processing power0.03952 TFLOPS2.15 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs448
L1 Cacheno data224 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.02.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 March 2008 27 September 2016
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm

E9260 MXM has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3200 and Radeon E9260 MXM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 3200 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon E9260 MXM is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 88 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon E9260 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3200 or Radeon E9260 MXM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.