GeForce2 MX 200 PCI vs ATI Radeon HD 3200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1448not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameRS780NV11 B2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 March 2008 (17 years ago)3 March 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speed494 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors180 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm180 nm
Texture fill rate1.9760.7
Floating-point processing power0.03952 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.328 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.0N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 March 2008 3 March 2001
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm

ATI HD 3200 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 3200 and GeForce2 MX 200 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 3200
Radeon HD 3200
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 PCI
GeForce2 MX 200 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 88 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 3200 or GeForce2 MX 200 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.