Radeon PRO V710 vs ATI HD 2900 XTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated343
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.63
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameR600Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data3 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3203456
Core clock speed743 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors720 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate11.89432.0
Floating-point processing powerno data27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs16216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54
L0 Cacheno data864 KB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data54 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length315 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB28 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1656 MBps2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth106.0 GB/s504.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 28 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 158 Watt

PRO V710 has a 5500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1500% more advanced lithography process, and 51.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2900 XTX and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2900 XTX is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX
Radeon HD 2900 XTX
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2900 XTX or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.