Radeon R8 M435DX vs ATI HD 2900 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1018not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.58no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameR600Jet
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 December 2007 (17 years ago)12 December 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Core clock speed600 MHz955 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1030 MHz
Number of transistors720 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Wattno data
Texture fill rate9.60024.72
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS0.791 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs1624
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 December 2007 12 December 2016
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm

R8 M435DX has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2900 PRO and Radeon R8 M435DX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2900 PRO is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R8 M435DX is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
AMD Radeon R8 M435DX
Radeon R8 M435DX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 17 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 18 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M435DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2900 PRO or Radeon R8 M435DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.