GeForce GT 555M 2 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking954not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameR600GF116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 December 2007 (16 years ago)26 March 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320144
Core clock speed600 MHz675 MHz
Number of transistors720 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate9.60016.20
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS0.3888 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 December 2007 26 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 35 Watt

GT 555M 2 GB has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 471.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2900 PRO and GeForce GT 555M 2 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2900 PRO is a desktop card while GeForce GT 555M 2 GB is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M 2 GB
GeForce GT 555M 2 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 16 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate GeForce GT 555M 2 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.