UHD Graphics 630 Mobile vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1155not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.35no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameR600Coffee Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 November 2007 (17 years ago)3 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240192
Core clock speed601 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors720 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate7.21224.00
Floating-point processing power0.2885 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs123
TMUs1224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 November 2007 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 Mobile has an age advantage of 10 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2900 GT and UHD Graphics 630 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2900 GT is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 630 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
Radeon HD 2900 GT
Intel UHD Graphics 630 Mobile
UHD Graphics 630 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 8 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.