GeForce GT 340 OEM vs Radeon HD 2900 GT

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1113not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameR600GT215
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 November 2007 (16 years ago)2 February 2010 (14 years ago)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24096
Core clock speed601 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors720 million727 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt69 Watt
Texture fill rate7.21217.60
Floating-point performance288.48 gflops257.28 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz1700 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s27.2 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMIno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDAno data1.2

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 6 November 2007 2 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 69 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2900 GT and GeForce GT 340 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
Radeon HD 2900 GT
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
GeForce GT 340 OEM

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 30 votes

Rate GeForce GT 340 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.