GeForce RTX 4010 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1221not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency1.15no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRV630GA107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 June 2007 (18 years ago)16 April 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120768
Core clock speed800 MHz1417 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1762 MHz
Number of transistors390 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate6.40042.29
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPS2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs824
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cache64 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s96 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 50 Watt

ATI HD 2600 XT has 11.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 4010, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2600 XT and GeForce RTX 4010. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010
GeForce RTX 4010

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 98 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 26 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2600 XT or GeForce RTX 4010, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.