UHD Graphics 617 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated908
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.46
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRV630Amber Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 February 2008 (17 years ago)7 November 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120192
Core clock speed700 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors390 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate5.60025.20
Floating-point processing power0.168 TFLOPS0.4032 TFLOPS
ROPs43
TMUs824
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVIPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2008 7 November 2018
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 617 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and UHD Graphics 617. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics 617 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
Intel UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 617

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 79 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 617 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition or UHD Graphics 617, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.