Radeon 535 Mobile vs ATI HD 2600 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1285not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.11no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRV630Polaris 24
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 June 2007 (18 years ago)18 April 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120384
Core clock speed600 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors390 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80024.58
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs824
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cache64 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 18 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

ATI HD 2600 PRO has 42.9% lower power consumption.

535 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2600 PRO and Radeon 535 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2600 PRO is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 535 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Radeon HD 2600 PRO
AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
Radeon 535 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 260 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 172 votes

Rate Radeon 535 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2600 PRO or Radeon 535 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.