GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1233not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.07no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV630G96C
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 June 2007 (17 years ago)25 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12032
Core clock speed600 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors390 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8008.000
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-II
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz792 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s25.34 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 25 October 2008
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 23 Watt

9600M GT Mac Edition has an age advantage of 1 year, a 18.2% more advanced lithography process, and 52.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2600 PRO and GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2600 PRO is a desktop card while GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Radeon HD 2600 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition
GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 242 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2600 PRO or GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.