GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1270not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.09no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV630G98
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 June 2007 (18 years ago)4 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1208
Core clock speed600 MHz580 MHz
Number of transistors390 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8002.320
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS0.0232 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-I
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz702 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s11.23 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 4 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 13 Watt

ATI HD 2600 PRO has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

9300M GS GDDR3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 169.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2600 PRO and GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2600 PRO is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Radeon HD 2600 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3
GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 250 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2600 PRO or GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.