Radeon Vega 6 Mobile vs ATI HD 2400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1320not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.06no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV610Raven-M
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 February 2008 (16 years ago)8 January 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40384
Core clock speed398 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1101 MHz
Number of transistors180 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.59226.42
Floating-point processing power0.03184 TFLOPS0.8456 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed495 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth7.92 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 February 2008 8 January 2018
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 15 Watt

Vega 6 Mobile has an age advantage of 9 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2400 and Radeon Vega 6 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2400 is a desktop card while Radeon Vega 6 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2400
Radeon HD 2400
AMD Radeon Vega 6 Mobile
Radeon Vega 6 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 46 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 41 vote

Rate Radeon Vega 6 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.