GeForce GTX 860M OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1398not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.05no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameRV610GM107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 June 2007 (18 years ago)5 February 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40640
Core clock speed525 MHz1020 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1085 MHz
Number of transistors180 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate2.10043.40
Floating-point processing power0.042 TFLOPS1.389 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs440
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cache32 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s80.19 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 5 February 2015
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 75 Watt

ATI HD 2400 PRO has 275% lower power consumption.

GTX 860M OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2400 PRO and GeForce GTX 860M OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2400 PRO is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 860M OEM is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
Radeon HD 2400 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M OEM
GeForce GTX 860M OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 70 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 51 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 860M OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2400 PRO or GeForce GTX 860M OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.