GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1388not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.03no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV610G96C
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 June 2007 (18 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4032
Core clock speed525 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors180 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate2.1008.800
Floating-point processing power0.042 TFLOPS0.0896 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data175 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 29 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 50 Watt

ATI HD 2400 PRO has 150% lower power consumption.

9500 GT Rev. 3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2400 PRO and GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
Radeon HD 2400 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 70 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2400 PRO or GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.