A800 PCIe 40 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1333not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.03no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV610GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2007 (17 years ago)8 November 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores406912
Core clock speed525 MHz765 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors180 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate2.100609.1
Floating-point processing power0.042 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs4160
TMUs4432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount256 MB40 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s1,555 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 8 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 40 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 250 Watt

ATI HD 2400 PRO has 1150% lower power consumption.

A800 PCIe 40 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 15900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2400 PRO and A800 PCIe 40 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2400 PRO is a desktop card while A800 PCIe 40 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
Radeon HD 2400 PRO
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 40 GB
A800 PCIe 40 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 62 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A800 PCIe 40 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.