Radeon R9 A375 vs ATI HD 2400 PRO PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated883
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRV610Venus
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 June 2007 (18 years ago)2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40640
Core clock speed525 MHz1015 MHz
Boost clock speedno data925 MHz
Number of transistors180 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate2.10040.60
Floating-point processing power0.042 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs440
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz4.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVIPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm

R9 A375 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI and Radeon R9 A375. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
AMD Radeon R9 A375
Radeon R9 A375

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 12 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R9 A375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI or Radeon R9 A375, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.