GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated325
Place by popularitynot in top-10086
Power efficiencyno data28.61
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV610TU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 June 2007 (18 years ago)23 April 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores401024
Core clock speed525 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors180 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate2.10095.04
Floating-point processing power0.042 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cache32 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 50 Watt

ATI HD 2400 PRO PCI has 150% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 11 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1948 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.