Tegra K1 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameRV610GK20A
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 June 2007 (18 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40192
Core clock speed525 MHz756 MHz
Boost clock speedno data951 MHz
Number of transistors180 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt8 Watt
Texture fill rate2.1007.608
Floating-point processing power0.042 TFLOPS0.3652 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xIGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3ES 3.1
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 8 Watt

Tegra K1 has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP and Tegra K1. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
NVIDIA Tegra K1
Tegra K1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 10 votes

Rate Tegra K1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP or Tegra K1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.