GeForce RTX 3080 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated28
Place by popularitynot in top-10089
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.79
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV610GA102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 June 2007 (17 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores408704
Core clock speed525 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1710 MHz
Number of transistors180 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate2.100465.1
Floating-point processing power0.042 TFLOPS29.77 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs4272
Tensor Coresno data272
Ray Tracing Coresno data68

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount256 MB10 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s760.3 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2007 1 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 10 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 320 Watt

ATI HD 2400 PRO AGP has 1500% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP and GeForce RTX 3080. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5704 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.