Zhongshan Subor Z+ GPU vs Radeon Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking965not rated
Place by popularity12not in top-100
Power efficiency9.38no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRenoirFenghuang
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data3 August 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4481536
Core clock speedno data1300 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate42.00124.8
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2896

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data153.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.2
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt

Graphics has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics and Zhongshan Subor Z+ GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics is a desktop graphics card while Zhongshan Subor Z+ GPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics
AMD Zhongshan Subor Z+ GPU
Zhongshan Subor Z+ GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8102 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Zhongshan Subor Z GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics or Zhongshan Subor Z+ GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.