RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB vs Radeon Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking959not rated
Place by popularity11not in top-100
Power efficiency9.37no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRenoirGA107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateno data12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4482560
Core clock speedno data1117 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1612 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate42.00129.0
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPS8.253 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs2880
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

Graphics has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics and RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics is a desktop graphics card while RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB
RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 7980 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 9 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics or RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.