Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking949not rated
Place by popularity12not in top-100
Power efficiency9.29no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRenoirAD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateno data26 February 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4482560
Core clock speedno data1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate42.00162.0
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPS10.37 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs2880
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Graphics has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics and RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics is a desktop graphics card while RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 7744 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 13 votes

Rate RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics or RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.