Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) vs Radeon Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking943not rated
Place by popularity11not in top-100
Power efficiency9.25no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameRenoirAlder Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44864
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate42.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
OpenGL4.6no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm

Graphics has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics and Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics is a desktop graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake)
Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 7564 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 72 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics or Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.