ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T vs Radeon Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking966not rated
Place by popularity12not in top-100
Power efficiency9.39no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameRenoirR360
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data1 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448no data
Core clock speedno data412 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data117 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate42.003.296
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared344 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.02 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm

Graphics has a 2043% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Graphics and FireGL 9800 X2-256T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics is a desktop graphics card while FireGL 9800 X2-256T is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8239 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9800 X2-256T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Graphics or FireGL 9800 X2-256T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.